Mimosa Action & Humidity's impact on its reaction to touch

Mimosa Action!

Hi there ! We are students from the “Frontiers of Life” bachelor, created and hosted by the Centre of Research and Interdisciplinarity ! The Biosensors seminary has slowly come to an end, and the project we worked on and are about to present, is the last one out of 4.

For those who do not know what the Biosensors are and missed our first blog posts, it’s an interdisciplinary seminar during which we develop and design in small groups several one-week scientific research-projects connected to each other by various notions such as light, forces and chemical gradients.

The aim of these projects is to observe and compare biological (plants, bacteria, insects, vertebrate, human ….) and electronic sensors (light, movement, conductivity, temperature sensors…).

This week, the comparison wasn't necessary, and we were free to develop any project, as long as it involved sensing (biological or electrical).

For our last project, we decided to study one of the most fascinating phenomena in the plant kingdom : thigmonasty. Thigmonasty consists in the response of a plant to touch or vibrations.  Mimosa pudica appears in scientific literature as a common example capable of responding to various stimuli (rain drops, wind …)

We got inspired by a project that had been conducted by former FDV students in 2013, named “Electrical response of Mimosa pudica to an external stimulus”. Mimosa pudica is a herb that has leaves that fold inward when touched. The project consisted in comparing the voltage response of Mimosa pudica  (in terms of electrical potential) according to the nature of the stimulus. They could observe that the response differs whether the stimulus was mechanical or electronic.

After more bibliographic research, we realised that water was the basis of the thigmonastic reaction.

Indeed, the thigmonastic movement is produced by the main pulvinus (sort of articular surface from a plant) at the base of the petiole (stalk that attaches the leaf to the stem) and «results from the explosive loss of water from specific cells in the pulvini, causing the cells temporarily to collapse and inducing very quick curvature in the organ where they are located»

(http://plantsinaction.science.uq.edu.au/edition1/?q=content/8-2-5-nastic-movements) . This reaction also causes a variation in the electrical potential of the plant.

Combining these informations, we asked ourselves this question:

Do different water conditions impact Mimosa pudica’s electric response to a stimulus?

According to previous studies, the efflux of potassium ions (chemicals that own an electrical charge) from the pulvinar cells of Mimosa Pudica was shown to increase substantially during the seismonastic reaction,  generating an electric current which can be measured by means of a voltmeter or an oscilloscope.

We supposed that the plant’s cells watered with different amounts of water would release various volumes of electrolytes (ie. fluids carrying electric charges), and thus that we could measure a variation in the electric response of the plants according to the humidity of the earth the mimosa growing in.  

What did we compare?

To answer this question, we used 9 Mimosa that grew in the same conditions. We divided them into 3 different humidity conditions,  planning to take 3 measures (repetitions) per plant:

• 3 of them were dried using a dehumidificator (“dry”)
• 3 of them were left as they were (“normal”)
• 3 of them were watered with 20 cL of water (“wet”)

One of us was then chosen to touch each plant so as to minimize the variation in “force” used.

What did we measure?

We then had to acquire our data. We placed 2 electrodes on our Mimosa, one in its soil as a reference and one on the node of the branch stimulated.

After that, we connected it to a voltmeter and tested our protocol. That was when we encountered our first difficulty: the electrode would detach each time the plant was stimulated!
We thought about other types of electrodes, but they would've broken our stems and we didn't want to hurt our Mimosa. We were quite stumped.

That is when we had an idea: why not use an oscilloscope! The oscilloscope’s electrodes are easy to place and with their hook-like shape wouldn't fall of!

We found our physics teacher and asked him if he could lend us an oscilloscope and its electrodes. He did more than that! He showed us many types of electrodes, helping us choose the most adapted, and helped us install the oscilloscope, showing us how to set it up, how to acquire the data directly on a USB key (instead of filming the screen and try to transform it into data) and testing its usefulness on Mimosa with us.

Thanks to this new tool we were able to design our final precise protocol that we will use to acquire data. So we repeated a simple experience for all the conditions that we described above. Indeed we created a mechanical stimulus during an electrical tension acquisition with the oscilloscope to observe the response on the drawn graph.

We knew that amplitude of the signal after the stimulus and the time it takes to go back to “normal” (return time) were two good indicators to quantify the response. So, as you might expect it, we measured both for each of our 27 graphs.

What are our results?

Then, we decided to plot the averages values per plant (repetitions) as one bar but the different plants (replicates) separately. Thus we obtained those two graphs (the first one represents the amplitude of the signal’s peak and the second one the return time, both depending on water conditions).

In both case, we seem to see an increase of both the amplitude of the perturbation and the return time as we expected. This finding would mean that water would have a direct impact on the electric response of the plant.

But this trend, is not measurable. Indeed we have been constrained to name the conditions “arbitrary” because our soil humidity sensor appeared to be unworking.    

Anyway, we have also notices that in each case, the return time and the amplitude of the peak are directly correlated. Indeed we can see exactly the same relative differences between all the replicates on the two graphs.

   

Finally, this project was for us a chance to develop our background knowledge on a particular subject and to train our project leading skills. Hopefully, it might brings you [readers] something on one of this two aspects of research!

Curious? Interested? Want to know more? Have a look at the links :

• Want to read scientific articles about Mimosa pudica and its thigmonastic reaction? Have a look here or there!
• If you want more information, but easier to understand than scientific articles, you might prefer reading this, that and what about this instead!
• Or maybe you want to grow out your own Mimosa pudica? You can find information here!

How does heat shock impact the yeast cycle of life?

How does heat shock impact the yeast cycle of life?

How does this fascinating question came in our mind?

For the final project of the Biosensors month, we decided to focus on…

thermal shock !

In microbiology field, thermal shocks are mainly used for DNA cloning. Cloning is a major technique used in microbiology and molecular biology in order to artificially or naturally multiply DNA, usually a gene, thanks to a micro-organism. It allows a higher expression of these genes useful to protein production. Process includes an alternation of cold and hot temperatures applied on microorganisms culture, as you can see on this video, that compare heat shock and a chemical process. Alteration allows the introduction of a gene inside the cell pursuing cellular division. The gene of interest is therefore transmitted to next generations.

But how does this technique allow the insertion, what happens inside the membrane? It is simple enough: heat fluidifies the proteins and phospholipids presents in the membrane. But shocks can disturb the membrane if the temperature is too high because proteins are denatured i.e they are not functional anymore and phospholipids are disorganized. So a well-balanced temperature has to be choose for the DNA cloning.

Now you know how heat shock works and probably better understand why we wanted to study heat shock effects over micro-organisms membranes for our last week project.  

Figure 1: Here is a small sketch of what you need to know basically on microbiology.

But… How did we answer that question? A beautiful story about yeast and dye

Which cobaye? Baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a model organism commonly used in biology!

Figure 2: Observation with the microscope of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Yeast tolerates temperature between 0 to 55°C but it is a temperature dependant organism and we thought it would therefore be more sensitive to high temperatures. Doing bibliography we found that 50°C was the ideal temperature for shocking yeasts but we then had to figure a way to observe shock impact.

How? a red dye named Phloxine B !

Living yeasts pump out the dye when they are metabolically active (alive) but stay red tinted when they die. We were now able to count the dead cells after the shock and to compare lifespans at ambient and hot temperatures!

Fig. 3: We used S. cerevisiae culture to observe yeast growth and shock them. Growth curve observation is meant to indicate first the right moment to start experiments then the impact of these experiments on yeasts.

Fig. 4: example of growth curve representative of yeasts concentration. Exponential phase is the time when cells divide rapidly so their membranes are flexible therefore the ideal moment to perform our experiments!

What we finally obtain… Not expected but still a beginning:

            Fig. 5: yeasts we have seen under the microscope.

We observed yeasts under the microscope and saw that after 50°C shock, yeasts had a red halo. Our hypothesis about this phenomena is that heat allows the phloxine B to go into cells easier because yeasts first use its energy to keep  their membranes functional, not explode then to expulse the phloxine B. But only boiled yeast (80°C heat shock) were totally red, this is the positive control, which allow us to verify phloxine B action on dead yeasts.

Fig. 6: positive control i.e experiment whom result is known and prove

that protocol is suitable

Our conclusion on this amazing experiment:

Running out of time, we were not able to continue the growth observation and see heat shocks affect over time. Even if cells began to stay red which allowed us to suppose that heat shock effectively reduces yeasts lifespan, we also can not conclude about long term effect.

You may ask what comes next? Well, doing these experiments again!

During this week, we faced some difficulties and finished running after some more time but we all agreed that if we had to try we would keep the protocol but use a different yeast strain: one that kindly accepts to actually grow!

If you want more informations, just click here:

Figure 2 comes from this place!

Figures 3 and 4 let you think that we are artists but were got with the little help of [a] friend

If you want to discover how cool organisms are yeasts, just go here!

We do not have cool pictures to show you but here you can learn how to create fluorescein, Phloxine B cousin dye! Just remember that phloxine does not need fluorescent filter to be seen

AllaFourmis: How ants can explore a new environment ?

This is the story of our final one-week project. It all started from this video we saw on youtube. From that, we wondered how sensible were ants to magnetic fields, and found this article.

The question we decided to enquire on during this week was thus “What factors determine how an ant choses to explore its environment”.

What we know of ants is that they leave chemical messages for their  peers, called pheromones, and those inform the other ants of what direction they took and what they found there. The more ants go that way, the more the pheromone trail intensifies, and the more ants are likely to go that way as well.

But what if there are no pheromones in the first place? what influences the first decisions?

This is what we decided to test this week, and in two ways: By the presence of another specie’s pheromone, and by the orientation of the environment’s magnetic field.

Thanks to some master students, we got two species of ants: Messor sancta and fire ants. We placed four boxes of 30 messor in a device that trained them to get food only from one direction in the magnetic field, which was supposed to get them used to orient following this field. We let them get this habit for two whole days before switching the magnetic field and testing to see if they naturally went the other way.

During that time, we did experiments on another way that could influence how ants explore its environment.  

Each ants’ species have their own pheromone but we asked ourselves if one species could recognize another ants’ pheromone. Our two species never interact naturally because they are geographically separated. So there are they are not “friend nor enemies”.

Basically we put next to each species’ anthill some tubes in which they would go and leave a pheromone trail.

Schema of the pheromones experiments

After 1 hours one of the paths was covered with pheromone and other was not. After this we exchanged the tubes to see how the ant’s reacted to the other specie’s scent. At the intersection of the tube, The ants had to choose between the two paths to find food. To see which way the ants went in each tube ( left or right ) we built a motion sensor that we put around the tubes. Of course we could use our eyes but as we did many long experiments we had to find a way to automate the ant’s detection.

Our boxes-sensors put on our tubes

We thus built a box in which we placed a LED (light-emitting diode) and a LDR ( light-dependent resistor). The principle is simple. As the ants pass through the tube, they go between the LED and the LDR. It then blocks some of the light and the LDR detects the light intensity difference. With an arduino code we are able to see the decrease of luminosity caused by the passing of ants.

The same apparatus was used to detect the ant’s decision in the magnetic field experiment, and we could clearly see which path they chose.

So what did we found out?

Well it appears that the ants tend to follow the food pheromone trail no matter who left it ! They mostly went in the tube where the other specie had left a trail. Incredible, isn’t it?

Graphs that we have obtened for magnetic experiment

For the magnetic field, the ants did not choose a particular path, and went in both tubes in equal proportions. So either the messor sancta are not reactive to magnetic field, or they just did not stay there long enough to get used to orient in function of the magnetic field.

The device for magnetic experiment

By Anne-Pia Marty, Louis Gallard, Léon Grillet et Amélie Bouissou

References:

• http://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/
• J.B. Anderson, R.K. Vander Meer, Magnetic orientation in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, Nature, dec 1993.
• Alexander N. Banks and Robert B. Srygley Orientation by magnetic field in leaf-cutter ants, Atta colombica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) international journal of behavioral biology, oct 2003
• Yilmaz camlitepe, David J. Stradling Wood Ants Orient to Magnetic Fields, the royal society biological sciences Published 22 July 1995.
• Fernando J. Guerrieri, Volker Nehring, Charlotte G. Jørgensen, John Nielsen, C. Giovanni Galizia, Patrizia d'Ettorre, Ants recognise foes not friends, Proceedings of the royal society, biological sciences, May 2009
• Vincent Fourcassié, Audrey Dussutour, Jean-Louis Deneubourg, Ant traffic rules, Journal of Experimental Biology 2010 213: 2357-2363; doi: 10.1242/jeb.031237
• Andreas Simon Brandstaetter, Annett Endler, Christoph Joannes Kleineidam, Nestmate recognition in ants is possible without tactile interaction, Nature, july 2008.